In discussing natural selection,
Charles Darwin describes "a power incessantly ready for action, and...as
immeasurably superior to man's feeble efforts, as the works of Nature are to
those of Art" (40). This definition indicates that he views
creation as an “outside force” intrinsic to the universe and unreachable to
humans. Regardless of whether or not he ascribes this pattern to divine causes,
he sees it as strictly non-human. People may craft “Art,” but such endeavors
are “feeble” compared to what nature has to offer (40).
By frequently repeating the word “geometric,”
Darwin indicates that the workings of the universe are fundamentally mathematical,
objective, and separate from the emotional sphere of humanity (42). However, he
also sees them as “beautiful,” perhaps because
of these reasons (39). Without human intervention, systems of nature seem to
interlock flawlessly. Keeping in time with the flux of nature, “varieties…[continually]
become converted into new and distinct species,” and “complex relationships of…animals
and plants” flourish (38,39).
Tessellating all of these universally
inherent patterns, natural selection propels everything towards “perfection”
(39). In this way, it does not evoke a cold or chaotic world, but one of
systematic harmony—one that makes more sense than “a special act of creation”
(36). It does not degrade creation into something lowly and utilitarian; it actually
elevates it into something pure, something unadulterated by arbitrary whim.
Thus, Darwin indicates that
singular, divine acts of creation are not necessary in order for nature to be
beautiful or pristine. Nor must one necessarily associate his theory of natural
selection with atheism. In the system’s pure non-humanness, there is room for
both the nonreligious and the religious—something that his critics fail to
discern.